Andrew Mole

My feedback

  1. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Structural feedback – SMALL ideas » GSA  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew Mole shared this idea  · 
  2. 15 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Structural feedback – SMALL ideas » GSA  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew Mole supported this idea  · 
  3. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Structural feedback – SMALL ideas » GSA  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew Mole supported this idea  · 
  4. 26 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Structural feedback – SMALL ideas » GSA  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew Mole supported this idea  · 
  5. 23 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Structural feedback – SMALL ideas » GSA  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew Mole supported this idea  · 
  6. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Structural feedback – SMALL ideas » GSA  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew Mole supported this idea  · 
  7. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Structural feedback – SMALL ideas » GSA  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew Mole supported this idea  · 
  8. 37 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Structural feedback – BIG ideas » Adsec  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew Mole commented  · 

    AdSec 8.4 has a batch option that can be used to do this.

  9. 74 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    open for voting  ·  5 comments  ·  Structural feedback – BIG ideas » GSA  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew Mole commented  · 

    I would suggest that this be accommodated by adding scripting support and then get individual locations to do their own customisation. The MSWord COM interface could be used to place diagrams in a document in one go, or in specific locations.

    All engineers should have programming skills...

  10. 198 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    open for voting  ·  5 comments  ·  Structural feedback – BIG ideas » Adsec  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew Mole commented  · 

    As you plan this, I think it would be good to look at Response-2000 http://www.ecf.utoronto.ca/~bentz/r2k.htm

    Andrew Mole commented  · 

    Yes Andrew, I agree. I think that Damian Grant has some requests along these lines for seismic checks - confinement etc. Definitely necessary.

    Andrew Mole supported this idea  · 
  11. 27 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    open for voting  ·  2 comments  ·  Structural feedback – BIG ideas » GSA  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew Mole commented  · 

    I feel that this is a very important part of GSA's future, since it allows the community to add features that merely manipulate data and leaves Oasys free to focus on the interface and the solvers.

    It might be worth having a word with the Campus team to see what they did for the LS-Dyna Suite. Those programs now all support object-oriented javascript. Providing a menu for user-features that list scripts would be good.

    Andrew Mole commented  · 

    I think that this would be helpful, especially if scripts could be stored and referenced from a menu. What language would you be implementing. Javascript or some form of visual basic would presumably be best.

    Andrew Mole supported this idea  · 
  12. 6 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  1 comment  ·  Structural feedback – BIG ideas » GSA  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew Mole commented  · 

    Definitely something useful and necessary for the future. I feel that one of the key development issues for GSA is opening up the interface for users to add features - user-defined design checks and importing data from and exporting data to different programs (ideally by means of the DesignLink codebase. Oasys could then stay focussed on the interface and the solvers.

    Andrew Mole supported this idea  · 
  13. 101 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Structural feedback – BIG ideas » GSA  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew Mole commented  · 

    I have run out of votes... perhaps I need to review the other items I have voted for...

    I think that creep and shrinkage would definitely be valuable analysis tools, both for bridge analysis and for tall buildings..

    Being able to feed results from one analysis stage into another was something that I thought was mostly already covered as part of staged construction.What kind of analysis is not currently covered?

  14. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    open for voting  ·  1 comment  ·  Structural feedback – BIG ideas » Sigraph  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew Mole commented  · 

    Thanks - I think that this is actually my comment transferred to Oasys Voice. I would also like to see tripartite plotting for seismic spectra.

  15. 11 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    open for voting  ·  3 comments  ·  Structural feedback – BIG ideas » ADC  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew Mole commented  · 

    I agree with Chris... this should also be in AdSec... or perhaps in a super-GSA-AdSec-ADC?

  16. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    open for voting  ·  0 comments  ·  Structural feedback – BIG ideas » GSA  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew Mole supported this idea  · 
  17. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    open for voting  ·  2 comments  ·  Structural feedback – BIG ideas » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew Mole commented  · 

    This would definitely be good and is one of the ways that AdSec lags behind competitors. I would have thought that you could leverage some of the GSA graphic capabilities. I have toyed with the idea of writing something like this in Rhino - not actually that difficult (I think...), just time consuming. Ideally the next step for DesignLink would be to add section definitions for interaction with AdSec and GSA (once the new unified section definitions are in).

    Andrew Mole supported this idea  · 
  18. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    open for voting  ·  2 comments  ·  Structural feedback – BIG ideas » GSA  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew Mole commented  · 

    We already have a link via DesignLink (although it currently needs updating). Perhaps this could be implemented as one of a system of user-defined add-ins (along with scripting support)?

  19. 18 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    open for voting  ·  6 comments  ·  Structural feedback – BIG ideas » GSA  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew Mole supported this idea  · 
    Andrew Mole commented  · 

    I don't think it is clear to most people that this is part of speeding up the analysis. Isn't there already another item for speeding up analysis? Why wouldn't this be with that? I guess it is a different route - ie heading towards parallel processing.

  20. 8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    started  ·  1 comment  ·  Structural feedback – BIG ideas » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Andrew Mole commented  · 

    Glad to see this has been started. No need to waste a vote on it then! I look forward to seeing it along with integration between GSA and AdSec. :-)

← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base