It is currently not possible to apply both tensile and compressive loads in the same file to compare against the calculated resistances. The programme subtracts the tensile loads which are applied as negative loads from the compressive loads which are positive instead of recognising them as separate loads.

Able to open Frew data file in Slope for slope stability analysis

A new update allows you to edit the MEFP at each stage and in each material. However, it defaults to y0=0 at each stage and therefore is not applied unless you go through each stage and change this. Please can the MEFP default to the top node level unless specified otherwise?

Hi , currently graphical output is not showing wall dimensions, its good if it shows all dimensions and can be exportable to auto cad program

Please can you allow a limit to be set to prevent props going into tension? Currently a multi-propped wall with no embedment doesn't fail as the top prop goes into tension.

Where embedded pile retaining walls carry axial loads, it is common practice to analyse the section as a rectangular panel rather than individual circular piles (with a reduced end bearing co-efficient akin to a deep strip footing).

To date, we have achieved this by modelling an under-ream pile with different shaft and base diameters. However, it would be simpler and clearer if Pile could analyse a rectangular section. This would also be beneficial for calculation of axial resistance for diaphragm wall panels.

Refer to method of Hov et al from 2010 DFI Conference (attached).

Presently in the FREW graphical output each layer is labelled with a number. If the graph is printed/copied on a report there is no way for the reader to understand which geomaterial the model refers to withouth having access to the materials properties table. Superimposing the name given by the user on the graph improves legibility.

Alp now handles only perfectly vertical piles, it could be nice if it handles inclined piles